Attention liberal dullards: Obama cynically uses children to market his gun grab

I would like to make this clear to all you liberal dullards out there, Obama’s plan to ban assault rifles has got nothing to do with protecting children; it has everything to do with making the second amendment null and void.

Even though his assault-rifle ban is unlikely to pass Congress as reported by Realclearpolitics, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and many others, it is clear what Obama’s intentions are. He hasn’t called for a ban on handguns when they kill more people, and for that matter he hasn’t called for a ban on hammers either when they kill more people as well. No, Obama just wants to ban assault rifles, and the reason for that is clear; assault rifles can be used in combat against his totalitarian agenda. He knows very well rational Americans will rise up against the communist direction his party is taking America, and with assault rifles out of the picture the road to tyranny is a lot easier.

Yesterday, in respect to Europe, Bill O’Reilly said Europe has gone so far to the left now it can never get back—“it’s gone,” he said. And he is absolutely right there, which brings me to the following question: wouldn’t Europeans, especially the Brits, just love to have assault rifles now? And I would suggest New Zealand is in the same boat—it’s gone as well.

Now back to that cynical, hypocritical prick Obama; the guy who is sceptical about armed officers in schools but has armed officers to protect his own kids at their school; the guy who says children shouldn’t be used in politics  but always exploits children to market his agenda. Watch the following NRA video ad and Laura Ingraham’s take on Obama:

NRA Video Ad:

Laura Ingraham’s take on Obama:

Obama's political "child abuse"

For 5 years I have documented the hypocrisy and prevarication of the President and First Lady on the issue of using children in political contexts.  The president's double-talk on how "children should be off-limits" in our political debates was obvious during his first campaign.  His daughters Malia and Sasha (both who seem delightfully unpretentious and well-adjusted), have, in fact, been referenced repeatedly to add an emotional resonance to President Obama campaign to remake America.  In the First Lady's campaign against obesity, we learned about Sash's high BMI.  In the health care debate, we heard about ---'s diabetes scare.  In the BP oil spill, when so many faulted the president for his slow response, we were told his daughters approached him while shaving to ask, "Have you plugged the hole yet, Daddy?"  They were even mentioned when the President slammed Mitt Romney with his "war on women" meme. 

Of course Democrats have been using the children as human shields against criticism for decades: they are lined up behind liberal polls demanding more social spending, more regulations on business, and tax hikes.  So it should be no surprise to anyone that the President choose to exploit children once again in his pitch for greater gun controls.  Because he offers his gun policies "to save kids from violence," we are supposed to forget the consequences for the 2nd Amendment.  What is especially odious here is that Democrats vehemently fight for the continued destruction of the most innocent in the womb, the tiniest victims in a federally-sanctioned war on their human rights.  They "care" about the children?  Please.  They care about power, money and achieving their secular progressive utopia. Source