Promoting social and fiscal conservatism and freedom of speech for all New Zealanders
Opposing progressive liberalism, political correctness, and left-wing social engineering
Promoting social and fiscal conservatism and freedom of speech for all New Zealanders
Opposing progressive liberalism, political correctness, and left-wing social engineering
According to the Mail Online article at the bottom of this post, the UK Government has just released its draft bill on gay marriage and you guessed it; homosexuals don’t want adultery included as a legal reason for divorce—why?

The answer to ‘why’ is so simple even liberal ignoramuses should be able to grasp it: homosexuals don’t know what monogamy means. All the liberal and homosexual rhetoric about gay marriage being the same as heterosexual marriage is nothing but disgusting lies and deceit; they are pulling the wool over the already-blinded eyes of the apathetic New Zealander.
We all know homosexuals have no morality; they will have sex with anything that moves; they have the sexual libido of pack dogs. The fundamental difference between homosexual and heterosexual relationships is this: women. Women, regardless of any liberal spin, have sex in order to have a relationship and not vice versa; whereas with men—whether homosexual or heterosexual—sex is often the motivating factor—men, especially younger ones, by nature are lustful, hypersexual, sex machines. And therein lies the problem with homosexual marriage; homosexual marriages don’t have women; they don’t have women to control their sexual appetite. Whereas, in heterosexual marriages, women get married in order to make a nest for raising children in a stable environment—and monogamy is very much part of that deal.
Without question the homosexual-marriage agenda has got nothing to do with homosexuals desiring marriage; it has everything to do with homosexuals forcing their insecurities, inadequacies, and sickness onto the mainstream—to make themselves feel better about themselves; it is all about promoting homosexual activity into the mainstream.
The following from Mercatornet is a good read on why homosexuality is not conducive to marriage and adoption. In part, the article says:
The recently published Gay Couples Study conducted by Colleen Hoff at the Center for Research on Gender and Sexuality, San Francisco, looked at the relationships of 566 committed gay couples (males) over a three-year period. The study showed that 47 per cent of gay couples had “sex agreements” that specifically allowed sexual activity with others. An additional 8 per cent of couples were split: one person favored sex outside the relationship and the other expected monogamy. Only 45 per cent described their relationships as monogamous.
Proponents of “marriage equality” sing their refrain over and over: “Our relationships are just the same as yours.”
Not even close. While just 7 per cent of Americans believe that adultery (sexual infidelity by married, heterosexual partners) is morally acceptable, Dr Hoff’s report emphasizes that nearly 50 per cent of gays in committed relationships specifically affirm sexual infidelity. Other research shows shockingly higher rates (75-95 per cent) of non-monogamy in long-term gay relationships.
(Note that we are talking about male homosexual relationships here. Research on lesbian couples is sparse but one study finds that 20 per cent of lesbians pursue open relationships.)
But what of the roughly 45 per cent of gay relationships that, according to the study, do claim monogamy? Their relationships should yield insights applicable to traditional opposite-sex marriages, right?
Not likely. Any apparent similarity between gay relationships and heterosexual couples disappears once it becomes clear what “monogamy” means in the gay paradigm. A 2010 study from England entitled, "Gay Monogamy: I Love You But I Can't Have Sex With Only You", found that none of the gay couples in the study defined monogamy as sexual exclusivity. In fact, they all engaged in sex with outside partners, even though they professed to be in a monogamous relationship.
How’s that, again?
The Center for Research on Gender and Sexuality, in its spring 2010 newsletter, summarized the English study, explaining that sex with outside partners is the “monogamous” norm for gay couples.
Concept of adultery could be abolished in law as grounds for divorce in wake of Government’s plans for gay marriage
Plans to allow same-sex couples to marry in Britain could pave the way for the concept of adultery to be abolished in law, experts have said.
Under the Government's draft Bill only infidelity between a man and a woman constitutes adultery.
So while the law would give same-sex couples the right to wed, they would not be able to divorce their partner on the basis of adultery if their spouse went on to be unfaithful - unless they cheated with somebody of the opposite sex.
It also states that a straight person who discovered their husband or wife had a lover of the same-sex could not accuse their unfaithful partner of adultery in a divorce court.
Lawyers and MPs have argued that the distinction over adultery - which arose after Government legal experts failed to agree on what constitutes sex between same-sex couples - would cause confusion.
They warned it would create inequality between heterosexual and homosexual married couples who found themselves in the divorce courts, and said it would likely result in adultery being abolished altogether as a grounds for divorce.
The lawyers who drafted the Government's Bill managed to swerve the contentious question of what constitutes sex between homosexual couples by adding a clause which states that only 'conduct' between a married person and a person of the opposite sex would constitute adultery. Read more
Comments
If any one wanted an
If any one wanted an excellent example of what an utter fraud "marriage equality" is, then they need look no further than this "adultery-laws-only-apply-to-male-and-female-couples" law proposal to see.
So gay marriage still won't be equal to normal heterosexual marriages. Some get exempt from adultery laws while other don't. But of course, in the world of the homosexual Super Citizen, it doesn't matter what the law says, how it applies to others, or even the intent of the legislators who wrote it. All that matters is how homosexual activists can twist it to achieve their goal of not just forcing the rest of us to accept their chosen lifestyle, but it place it and themselves above any criticisms or scrutiny. Homosexuality should not be the equal of traditional heterosexual marriage and families, but its superior. What people chose to do in their bedrooms should be a private matter unless they are homosexual, then their sexual behaviour should be taught in the public schools, celebrated in the media, and warrant preferential treatment in the workplace. Additionally, all this should be backed with the full force of legislation to criminalize your thoughts should choose to speak out against homosexuality.
And liberals, of course, will
And liberals, of course, will spin any advantages gays may have as 'affirmative discrimination.' It is complete doublethink to replace so-called discrimination with reverse discrimination.
The Mail Online article clearly shows that gay relationships are not the same as heterosexual relationships but here we are promoting them into mainstream society. If they were equal, then it would be obvious to everyone that adultery laws would apply equally.
Urban, I will be doing a lot on this topic this week as there is just so much stuff out there that New Zealand media is just not covering. There is just so much that New Zealanders are unaware of.
Great ! And there is nothing
Great ! And there is nothing I enjoy more on the blogging front than shoving stats and findings from medical journals and gay niche media in the faces of liberals at Kiwiblog & the blog of that other pseudo-Right wing fag-stag "Whaleoil".
Add new comment