Promoting social and fiscal conservatism and freedom of speech for all New Zealanders
Opposing progressive liberalism, political correctness, and left-wing social engineering
Promoting social and fiscal conservatism and freedom of speech for all New Zealanders
Opposing progressive liberalism, political correctness, and left-wing social engineering
Gay marriage has all but passed; its passage has been the most shambolic, disgraceful, and undemocratic in New Zealand’s political history (see here, here, and here), yet no one is protesting about this—meanwhile gays get a gay parade subsidised by Auckland ratepayers. I, and I assume thousands of others like me are totally dismayed that the main opponents to gay marriage—namely Colin Craig, Winston Peters, and Bob McCoskrie—have not organised a protest up Queen Street or elsewhere as part of their strategy to defeat the bill.
However, we have seen excellent stuff achieved by these people; we’ve seen great debates; we’ve seen substantive articles that should have compelled any rational politician; we’ve seen thousands of signatures collected and presented to parliament, and we have all sent email upon email to politicians along with thousands of submissions to the select committee--all to no avail.
We can no longer afford to be polite to the politicians on the left, and that includes the National Party; we have to start shouting at them, which means a protest or protests—albeit possibly too late now.
At least 50% or 60% of New Zealanders who are vehemently opposed to the gay-marriage bill have been completely shafted by the select committee and the undemocratic process surrounding it; what is occurring here is far bigger than gay marriage; we are talking about a serious threat to democracy itself. People don’t like to use the term ‘totalitarianism’ because that only exists in other countries; it doesn’t exist in New Zealand, but what have we just witnessed with the gay-marriage bill? The entire process has been a disgraceful sham from the outset; we simply haven’t been heard; this is not democracy, people, this is the first step towards totalitarianism—a new and very unpleasant era for New Zealand. Even Winston Peters' call for a referendum on the issue was shunned 83 to 33 by our so-called democratic politicians.
Winston Peters, in his impassioned plea for democracy, doesn’t use strong words like ‘totalitarianism’ but he alludes to the same:
Even though it is probably too late now to organise a successful protest, I would still like to see one happen—even if it’s only to advance the conservative cause and get media exposure for the parties and organisations that have stood up for us.
Let’s face it; the National Party without question has joined the coalition of left-wing parties, and therefore should no longer be considered a party to form a coalition with but a party to defeat. And the way to do this is to form close relations with political parties, like NZ First, that share similar values. And in respect to the gay-marriage issue and referenda they have been very conservative indeed.
As my blog is very new, it doesn’t generate enough readership for me to organise a march myself; if it did, I most certainly would. However, Colin Craig, Winston Peters, and Bob McCoskrie have existing emailing lists and can easily mobilise a march. They just need to communicate with each other to make this happen, and it’s in their own interest to do so.
The march doesn’t need expensive bells and whistles; it just needs people with their signs, a venue, and would need to take place within a couple of weeks to have any impact at all.
Winton Peters:
winston.peters@parliament.govt.nz
Colin Craig (via press secretary):
Email: Rachel@conservativeparty.org.nz
Phone number: 09 520 2082
http://www.conservativeparty.org.nz/index.php?page=Contacts
Bob McCoskrie:
I will be making a sticky of this post; l will leave it at the top sometimes for one week just to test the waters.
Also, I would like to know your views on this so please feel free to comment.
Comments
Its too late to stop the
Its too late to stop the legislation but I do wonder if the legality will be more than 6 inches deep so to speak. You can pass laws but without people really being on board about it a resentment may develop. The gay lobby may eventually push hard enough against what many see as principles to see some push back harder. Not all people will be nice about it as not all people are nice. I was always taught to be careful what you wish for.
The fight has moved on and its next step is, I suspect, whether you, as a celebrant or similar, can decline to marry gays. That will be a much more direct fight as it will impact directly on freedoms rather than as just a conceptual imposition.
"Its too late to stop the
"Its too late to stop the legislation but I do wonder if the legality will be more than 6 inches deep so to speak. You can pass laws but without people really being on board about it a resentment may develop."
Brown, that is exactly correct; it is too late now; the damage has been done, but I wonder if we could have done more. As you allude to, gay marriage without people really being on board will not help gays, it will only create more resentment against them. Putting dogs in a chicken house, doesn't make dogs chickens. Allowing gays into marriage doesn't make gays heterosexual--it's that simple.
Add new comment