Promoting social and fiscal conservatism and freedom of speech for all New Zealanders
Opposing progressive liberalism, political correctness, and left-wing social engineering
Promoting social and fiscal conservatism and freedom of speech for all New Zealanders
Opposing progressive liberalism, political correctness, and left-wing social engineering
It’s the same same but completely different; walk along the waterfront from St. Heliers to Bastion Point and you will see some luxurious homes and high-rise buildings on multi-million-dollar land, and you will see some nice people out walking their poodles, etc; now walk up the hill through Bastion Point to Kupe St. Orakei and you will see similar multi-million-dollar land, but that’s as similar as it gets. You won’t see luxurious homes on this multi-million-dollar land, you will see run down and derelict state housing, some of which is owned by Housing New Zealand and some owned by Ngati Whatua; you won’t see nice people out walking their poodles, you will see tattooed thugs out walking their pitbull terriers.
One thing that is quite stark about this chalk and cheese situation is the fact that you will see tour buses proudly showing off the waterfront from St. Heliers to Mission Bay, and you will see busloads of tourists being taken up to Bastion Point, but you won’t see them being taken along Kupe St; I wonder why that is? Perhaps, just perhaps it has got something to do with hiding the gaping holes in our race relations; the reality of what we don’t want the world to see; the failed anti-utopian welfare state at work, but that’s another story.
About five years ago I walked along Kupe St—something I would not advise as it isn’t exactly the safest neighbourhood—and was really shocked to see the gutted state house below.

At the time I questioned how can this be happening in New Zealand; how can they have a gutted state house sitting on prime real-estate with panoramic views down the Waitemata Harbour to Waiheke; how is this possible? Fast forward five years, and the question still bugged me so I went back there—in the safety of my car this time—and nothing had changed; the gutted house was still there. So this time I took a photo of it and the street number and did a little digging.
The land value of this property is $1,110,000, the capital value is $1,220,000 and land size is 1,743 square metres. Just imagine for a moment that the property was surrounded by luxurious homes—as would be the case in the free market on prime land like that—and not state housing, the property value would be triple its present value. Being concerned about this situation, I phoned Housing New Zealand to find out who owned the property; one person said it was definitely Housing New Zealand property, but then another said it was Ngati Whatua property. I kind of believe the latter person; however, who owns the property is completely irrelevant. If Housing New Zealand owns it, they are doing an exceptionally poor job of managing tax-payer money. If Ngati Whatua own it, they are doing an exceptionally poor job of helping their people.
Either way it is classic example of how welfare and state housing is failing New Zealand. Land of that value must be sold on the open market and the capital reinvested where it is vitally required—and that certainly doesn’t mean more state housing.
Comments
Demanding that tenants look
Demanding that tenants look after the houses may be a violation of their Yooman Rites, Terry. Besides, the condition of "free" housing will almost always be inferior to owner occupied homes. No cost=not valued.
KG, I once saw a protest on
KG, I once saw a protest on TV after John Key said he proposed some welfare cuts, and one of the signs read "Take your hands off our welfare" as if it were their right; as if welfare belonged to them because they are Maori. The fact is many now believe it is a right..
They certainly do. I once
They certainly do. I once knew somebody in NZ on the dole who insisted on referring to it as his "pay" and he also had the brass neck to claim that he was a taxpayer!!
A very good post, Terry.
A very good post, Terry. What a shambles - yet more proof that welfare doesn't work and that anything the Left touches turns to shite.
You have that right, Thor.
You have that right, Thor. Even though the evidence is staring them in the face, they still push for more; they keep pushing the welfare addiction.
"it is classic example of how
"it is classic example of how welfare and state housing is failing New Zealand."
And how Iwi are failing Maori.
Half of the properties on Kupe St are owned by Ngati Whatua and the other half by Housing NZ. It appears that Housing NZ want to sell off their land, at a market rate, for expensive housing……….but Ngati Whatua have first refusal on the sale of any of these properties and want to keep their valuation as low as possible by keeping it a slum. No developer in his right mind would buy the HNZ land while the rest remains as it is.
Mawn, Ah, so that's what it's
Mawm, Ah, so that's what it's all about. I wasn't aware Ngati Whatua, have first refusal.
My source is Cactus Kate as
My source is Cactus Kate as linked below. Some interesting stuff……….if it is true.
http://asianinvasion2006.blogspot.co.nz/2010/11/kupe-street-heatleys-hea...
Mawm, thanks for the link.
Mawm, thanks for the link. Does first refusal mean someone else can't out bid them?
My understanding is that when
My understanding is that when another party makes an offer a the property, if you have a right of first refusal and can match that offer you will get it. Therefore it is in their interest to keep the prices as low as possible and/or not purchase until someone else comes in with a low offer.
Odakyu-sen, yes Kupe St.
Odakyu-sen, yes Kupe St. seems to be the main problem, but mawm seems to answer why.
Yes, Odakyu-sen I think you
Yes, Odakyu-sen I think you are right; Ngati Whatua are playing a very long game.
Add new comment